Contact Person(s)
Stefania Gori, David McKeen, Tao Liu and Jessie SheltonMore details on this mode may be found in Section 17 of Survey of Exotic Higgs Decays (arXiv:1312.4992).
Theoretical Motivation
Higgs decays to collimated lepton pairs may also arise in models with light vector bosons ZD that mix with the SM hypercharge gauge boson (see SM+Vector). The motivation to consider mZD << mh has been driven by dark matter models that require mZD ∼ GeV or below [3,4]. In these models, the branching fractions of ZD depend on the SM fermion gauge couplings, so electron and muon pairs are produced with comparable branching fraction unless mZD < 2mμ. Importantly, the branching fraction for h→ 2(ll) remains large even when mZD > 2mb, motivating searches for both electrons and muons in this mass range.
Dark photon models can give h→ 2 lepton-jets directly [5,6], via an initial decay h→ ZD ZD, as well as h→ 2 lepton−jets + MET. Among possibilities for obtaining MET are cascade decays involving fermions, e.g. χ2→ χ1 ZD, hidden sector showering or hadronization where ZD is produced along with some invisible hidden sector particles, see Hidden Valleys.
Existing Collider Studies
A collider search for h→ 2a→ 4μ was first proposed in [7], which took ma ≈ 215 MeV, as motivated by an excess in HyperCP measurements of Σ+→ pμ+μ− decay [8]. This study pointed out that modifications of the (then-)standard muon isolation algorithms would be required to preserve the signal. A more careful treatment of the dominant QCD backgrounds was carried out in [9], which concluded that there were excellent prospects for discovery in early 14 TeV LHC running (considering exotic branching fractions of tens of percent). Reference [10] performed a collider study of the Higgs decaying to multiple electron-jets plus MET through a 100 MeV ZD. Production in association with a leptonic W or Z was identified as the most promising channel, in which the dominant background is W or Z plus QCD jets. Reference [10] found that an analysis distinguishing electron-jets from QCD jets using the electromagnetic fraction and charge ratio of the jet candidates could discover the Higgs with 1 fb−1 of 7 TeV LHC data at 95% CL assuming unit branching fraction to electron-jets plus MET.Existing Experimental Searches and Limits
The h→ 2(μμ) signature has become established in experimental programs, beginning with the D0 search [11]. The most stringent constraints are set by the LHC, looking for Higgs decays to both prompt [12,13,14] and displaced [15] dimuon jets. As this final state is extremely clean, these searches are inclusive, and in particular do not require m4μ=mh. Thus they are sensitive to both the h→ aa →2(μμ) decay topology and the topology h→χ2χ2→ 2(μμ) +MET. The best existing limits on prompt h→ 2 (μμ)+X come from the recent CMS analysis [14], which was performed with the full 8 TeV data set. This search, like the previous CMS search [13], only covers the range 2mμ < ma < 2mτ.1 This search limits σ(p p → 2a+X)Br(a→μμ)2 αgen < 0.24 fb at 95% CL over almost all of the mass range in consideration, where αgen is a (model-dependent) fiducial acceptance. This translates to a limit Br(h→ aa)Br(a→ μμ)2 αgen < 1.2×10−5 for mh=125 GeV. Outside this mass range, the 35 pb−1 search of Ref. [12] extends to 5 GeV, placing limits of σ(p p → 2a+X)Br(a→ μμ)2 ϵ < 125 fb, where ϵ is again an acceptance. We have reinterpreted the results of Ref. [14] for the cascade decay h→ χ2χ2, χ2→ a (ZD)χ1, a (ZD)→ μμ in Fig. 1, for masses ma (mZD) = 0.4 GeV (blue), 1 GeV (green), and 3 GeV (red). Dark vector branching fractions to muons are taken according to the tree-level computation of SM+Vector, while a reference branching fraction Br(a→ μμ)=0.1 is assumed. Caution should be used in interpreting the recast limits for the smallest values of m2−m1, which is furthest from the spectra considered in Ref. [14], as in this region the linear relation between αgen and the full experimental efficiency may no longer hold.Figure 1: Approximate bounds on the branching fraction for h→ χ2χ2, assuming (left) Br(χ2 → a χ1) = 1, and (right) Br(χ2→ ZD χ1) = 1, as a function of mχ1, from [14]. Here solid lines indicate mχ2 = 50 GeV and dotted lines mχ2=60 GeV, while red, green, and blue correspond to ma, ZD = 3 GeV, 1 GeV, and 0.4 GeV respectively. For a we use a reference Br(a→ μμ) = 0.1.
Searches in electron-jets are more challenging. Nonetheless, searches for h→ 2 electron-jets have been carried out, targeting Wh associated production first at CDF with 5.1 fb−1 data [16], and later at ATLAS with 2.04 fb−1 of 7 TeV data [17] and inclusively for pairs of hard electron-jets (e.g. from squark production) with 5 fb−1 of 7 TeV data [18]. It is challenging to reinterpret the first two searches as a limit on Higgs decays to simple electron-jets, as both require > 2 tracks per electron-jet, to better reject photon conversions.
References
[1] P. Draper, T. Liu, C. E. Wagner, L.-T. Wang, and H. Zhang, Dark Light-Higgs Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 121805, [arXiv:1009.3963].
[2] J. Huang, T. Liu, L.-T. Wang, and F. Yu, Supersymmetric Exotic Decays of the 125 GeV Higgs Boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 221803, [arXiv:1309.6633].
[3] N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys.Rev. D79 (2009) 015014, [arXiv:0810.0713].
[4] M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Astrophysical Signatures of Secluded Dark Matter, Phys.Lett. B671 (2009) 391-397, [arXiv:0810.1502].
[5] M. Baumgart, C. Cheung, J. T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang, and I. Yavin, Non-Abelian Dark Sectors and Their Collider Signatures, JHEP 0904 (2009) 014, [arXiv:0901.0283].
[6] A. Falkowski, J. T. Ruderman, T. Volansky, and J. Zupan, Hidden Higgs Decaying to Lepton Jets, JHEP 1005 (2010) 077, [arXiv:1002.2952].
[7] S.-h. Zhu, Unique Higgs boson signature at colliders, [hep-ph/0611270].
[8] HyperCP Collaboration, H. Park et. al., Evidence for the decay Σ+→ pμ+μ−, Phys.Rev.Lett. 94 (2005) 021801, [hep-ex/0501014].
[9] A. Belyaev, J. Pivarski, A. Safonov, S. Senkin, and A. Tatarinov, LHC discovery potential of the lightest NMSSM Higgs in the h1→ a1 a1 → 4μ channel, Phys.Rev. D81 (2010) 075021, [arXiv:1002.1956].
[10] A. Falkowski, J. T. Ruderman, T. Volansky, and J. Zupan, Discovering Higgs Decays to Lepton Jets at Hadron Colliders, Phys.Rev.Lett. 105 (2010) 241801, [arXiv:1007.3496].
[11] D0 Collaboration, V. Abazov et. al., Search for NMSSM Higgs Bosons in the h → aa → μμ μμ, μμ ττ Channels Using p―p Collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV, Phys.Rev.Lett. 103 (2009) 061801, [arXiv:0905.3381].
[12] CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et. al., Search for Light Resonances Decaying into Pairs of Muons as a Signal of New Physics, JHEP 1107 (2011) 098, [arXiv:1106.2375].
[13] CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et. al., Search for a Non-Standard-Model Higgs Boson Decaying to a Pair of New Light Bosons in Four-Muon Final States, [arXiv:1210.7619].
[14] Search for a non-standard-model higgs boson decaying to a pair of new light bosons in four-muon final states, Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-010, CERN, Geneva, 2013.
[15] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et. al., Search for displaced muonic lepton jets from light Higgs boson decay in proton-proton collisions at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys.Lett. B721 (2013) 32-50, [arXiv:1210.0435].
[16] CDF Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et. al., Search for Anomalous Production of Multiple Leptons in Association with W and Z Bosons at CDF, Phys.Rev. D85 (2012) 092001, [arXiv:1202.1260].
[17] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et. al., Search for WH production with a light Higgs boson decaying to prompt electron-jets in proton-proton collisions at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, New J.Phys. 15 (2013) 043009, [arXiv:1302.4403].
[18] ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et. al., A Search for Prompt Lepton-Jets in pp Collisions at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys.Lett. B719 (2013) 299-317, [arXiv:1212.5409].
Footnotes:
1It also requires the two lepton jet masses to be within 0.1 GeV of each other, meaning it is insensitive to decays h → a1 a2 with a1 ≠ a2.File translated from TEX by TTH, version 4.03. On 18 Dec 2013, 10:54.